Several initiatives to promote AI research in the Netherlands have emerged over the past two years. Bits&Chips asked foremen Max Welling, Frank van Harmelen and Maarten de Rijke to highlight the importance of artificial intelligence for Dutch economy and Dutch society.
There are three major players on the worldwide AI stage: China, the US and Europe. America has been leading in investments. China is quickly catching up as a top contender, specializing in machine learning – which is also the main focus of the US. The power of Europe stems from its broad basis.
“Europe has a strong history in artificial intelligence,” says Frank van Harmelen, a professor in the AI department at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU). “To this day, most publications on AI originate in Europe.” However, Europe is highly divided. In China, investments are led by a centralistic state, whereas in the US, the investments come from big tech companies like Google and Microsoft. The European Committee decided large investments in AI are necessary for Europe to keep up with the Americans and the Chinese.
While Europe realized the importance of AI investments and started organizing the field, the Dutch political landscape seems to be still lagging. Van Harmelen feels the Netherlands has much to improve upon in terms of decisiveness. “Here, we endlessly look for support, bring parties together and organize roundtables in The Hague – it just takes so much time. In the meantime, research hurtles on.”
“AI is just an immensely important part of modern technology and economy,” says Max Welling, a professor in machine learning at the University of Amsterdam (UvA). He compares artificial intelligence to the arrival of computers or the Internet. “All technologies will advance using AI. That also poses challenges for society. We need to keep up with the revolution. Right now, we’re falling behind. Not because we don’t have the knowledge, but by how our society is responding.”
Our surrounding countries – England, France, Norway, Germany and Belgium – have all announced major investments. The Netherlands hasn’t invested at all. “We were one of the first to have AI bachelor’s and master’s programs. Other countries decided to make large investments. We did not,” states Maarten de Rijke, a professor of AI and information retrieval at UvA. Welling concurs: “We’ve been writing reports, but there haven’t been any real investments yet.”
Talent and capacity
On a European level, Claire and Ellis are the major initiatives for collaboration on AI research (see boxes). In the Netherlands, the Dutch AI Coalition was introduced to bring all initiatives together and function as a lobby towards The Hague. Welling: “It’s highly important to inform Dutch politics on the necessity of AI investments. Within The Hague, very few people have knowledge in this area. The Dutch AI Coalition will explain to them why AI is so important to the Dutch economy, how society is changing as a result and what we need to do to prevent us from falling behind.”
Welling has a prominent role in Ellis. “Ellis believes machine learning is the driving force behind the AI revolution,” he describes. “There’s an enormous increase in economic activity of AI. According to us, this is because of data-driven AI, also called machine learning.” Many other research topics, like robotics, language processing and image processing, use machine learning as their inherent technology. Ellis’s broad selection of topics stems from its bottom-to-top proposal structure. “We do have a selection committee, but in principle, they’re all grass-roots.”
Within the Netherlands, Ellis collaborates with the Dutch AI Coalition and Claire. Claire originated from an EU request. The European Committee expressed its willingness to invest in AI but stated it couldn’t communicate with hundreds of separate research groups all across the continent. The field needed to organize itself and come up with one organization to talk to. “That’s how Claire came to be,” explains Van Harmelen, who’s one of the initiative’s Dutch intermediaries.
“Generally, the next steps are expected to result from combining reasoning and learning, combining older techniques with technology developed during the last ten years,” Van Harmelen continues. This calls for a broadly oriented network with expertise from different angles in AI. “That’s the goal of Claire.”
Last December, Claire opened its European headquarters in The Hague. “The Netherlands traditionally has a strong position in the research field of AI,” tells Van Harmelen. “Large investments are needed if we want to maintain that position. In that light, The Hague is a logical choice.”
The lack of investments inspired another initiative in the Netherlands, which doesn’t mediate between research and politics: ICAI (see box). Together with colleagues from UvA and VU, De Rijke started it about two years ago because they saw the strategic role AI would play in society and felt something needed to happen. “If the Netherlands wants to remain in strategic control, we need to have the talent and the capacity to understand, design and develop that technology ourselves. To achieve this, we organized several labs under the ICAI umbrella. We don’t have any funding to offer, but we do share experiences, a vision on how collaborative research can be conducted between academia and industry and we connect different parties. Don’t wait, but act. That gives a strong sense of ownership.” Next to being the ICAI director, De Rijke is also in charge of one of the research labs and involved in two others.
Reap and regulate
Especially ICAI demonstrates that research institutes and companies can easily find each other and push forward. The government, however, remains absent. Since 2016, many countries worldwide have presented AI strategies on how to invest. “The Netherlands now finally has presented an AI vision, but, unfortunately, still hasn’t invested at all,” laments De Rijke.
“You would hope to create more speed at the national level,” states Van Harmelen. Welling agrees: “I hope for some movement within the Netherlands. We’ve been founding initiatives, but we really need to invest in the technology and the people that have the knowledge. Not only to reap the economic and societal rewards but also to regulate how we want to shape our society.”